This schema was automatically generated from a DTD by a perl script. The script is designed to produce a schema for a language that it some superset of the language generated by the DTD: all content models are reduced to repeating choice groups, and all attributes are just given type 'string'. TODO: a closer mapping of ? | + , and attribute types: enumeration, etc. About the indentation of the XML that is produced, I use the 'line-oriented approach' approach suggested in: Comments on the WD - A proposed alternative Arjun Ray (Sun, Feb 20 2000) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-canonicalization-comments/2000Feb/0005.html ( ENTITY , DISCLOSURE , REMEDIES ? , DISPUTES-GROUP ? , STATEMENT + , EXTENSION * )( DATA + , EXTENSION * ) +( EXTENSION * )( DISPUTES + , EXTENSION * ) +( EXTENSION * )( correct ? , money ? , law ? , EXTENSION * )( CONSEQUENCE ? , PURPOSE , RECIPIENT , RETENTION , DATA-GROUP + , EXTENSION * )( #PCDATA )( current ? , admin ? , develop ? , contact ? , customization ? , targeting ? , profiling ? , other-purpose ? , EXTENSION * )( #PCDATA )( ours ? , same ? , other-recipient ? , delivery ? , public ? , unrelated ? , EXTENSION * )( ( no-retention | stated-purpose | legal-requirement | indefinitely | business-practices ) , EXTENSION * )( DATA + , EXTENSION * ) +( #PCDATA | EXTENSION ) *( #PCDATA )